
Pakistan is geographically so important for all its keepers, that they’ll do anything to keep it in their interest. That why despite the so much turbulence in Pakistan, the billions of $ aid wont stop pouring in. It is very interesting to note the journey covered by Taliban so far in last few years. First of all USA is still carrying on its never-ending war in Afghanistan with Obama Administration sending more 30,000 troops. But for what? For years they have been after Taliban and what we get to see is, they have reached Pakistan! Now, the how is that possible? Simple Theory i.e. CHASE AND RUN THEORY! It is a second line diplomacy of US, which looks quite clear to me with the chronology of incidents happening. Lett me make it little more simple for everyone. Everyone knows about the tension between India and Pakistan, so why not create somewhat more? First of all incidents like 26/11 occurs in which all the evidences point to Pakistan thus making us the real angry guy! But then what we hear is so much of aid is given to Pakistan by USA to stabilize its economic condition. But the real point is, you create a situation where India goes for a return blow. But thanks to the Indian Diplomacy and its pillars that we handled it with our so called “lover letters to Pak Govt”. But from my point of view the patience and smartness shown by UPA Govt under Manmohan Singh is really appreciable. No doubt Obama want Mr. Singh sitting next to him at the World Economic Forum. Next thing what we see is Taliban which was chased by US military has reached Pakistan, so what I was thinking is that what will 30,000 more troops of USA will do in Afghanistan? Huh. I guess they‘ll wait for Taliban’s return. Then we hear someone called Headley is caught by the FBI who is supposed to involved in 26/11 attack in India. It was very surprising for me to know that FBI had been keeping keen interest in following the 26/11 . But you see, that’s what we call “mutual cooperation against terrorism” or say its “Global Terrorism”. But they don’t seem to have so much of a mutual interest to handover Headley to India. But in all this what we see is, when everyone knows that Pakistan is the most fertile soil for the growth of terrorists, which needs to be eroded at any cost, We see “Pak Keepers” ie USA, Japan etc coming up with billions of $'s . Well say, they want Pak to be more fertile or say if the money is ultimately comes back to them (USA) then what is the problem in creating a “Debt” . See the logic is quite simple the billions are spent on buying arms because you in a war like situation with India. So Pak which is an ally of US will buy arms from it private defence companies to secure itself, plus creating “debt” for themselves.The moment India and Pakistan goes for War the “Pak keepers” will become the World keepers!! Well how can US not interfere? Ha? Well then they might remind Pak of the debts and will not blink an eye before they set up a military base in Pak to control the whole of Asia.
But then lets go back to start, what about the 30,000 troops in Afghanistan?? Well they are chasing the Taliban those who are left there and will come along with them!!
if this your mind.............read more.......years long plan of destruction cannot be possibly conceived........things are now uncontrollable......yes there are some selfishnesses involved but still such a massive scale of domination nd pakistani importance is imaginery........
ReplyDeleteWell i guess their is massive scale of domination, which is quite clear to the world. What they did in Iraq, was again a cheap game, just because Saddam was supporting EU and its currency they went down to hunt whole of Iraq! They didnt even care abt world order nor the UN, which was more than domination i guess.
ReplyDeleteThis is somewhat i perceive from what i have read, but its clearly confessed by John Perkins in his book: "Confessions of an Economic Hitman"
Its a must read and it is somewhat imaginary but true!
>>Massive scale of domination by US is quite clear in the world order,they've always being cheap enough to come up with such diplomacy to feed their war based economy!
ReplyDelete>> Secondly, my point of view about Pakistan's importance is in reference of its geographical location not as a nation. How can it have any importance with no economic,political or social stability.
hey junaid, gud to see u blogging
ReplyDeletedost i disagree on many terms here and would like to discuss them too,
1. the multi dollar aid is not for filling their pockets but to keep their economy working or else it may lead to total system failure, with all the anti-social elements/ terrorists coming in to power(though u may call the present govt to be so but they still pose answerable), ----- and we will not like that to happen in our neighbourhood, that too a nuclear state.
2. taliban has never been in the priority list of US rather it is Al-Kaida (which is now dwindling)
@Robota: Thanks!Have been trying to blog regularly but really don't get much of a time for now. Well anyways, couldn't recognize you through your profile.
ReplyDeleteWell regarding your concerns:
Well the aids given to Pakistan are mostly military in nature,Since 2002 US itself amounts to almost 11.7billion $ military aid to Pakistan to fight terror. Otherwise, the aids are concerning the food crisis,electoral process and stability for civil development. I guess, an economy of 170 million doesn't really works only on aids.Even if we consider it,would be childish and fussy.
And regarding your second point..LMAO bro! Are u kidding me.Taliban has been the main concern not only for US but for the whole world. The worlds oldest and the biggest Terror organisation of 45,000 aims mainly to fight against US,Afghan govt, and ISAF(International security assistance force) NO doubt US has been hunting AL-Qaieda after the 9/11 but as you said its now dwindling.In Oct 2010,during the three day US-Pak summit in Washington,the US announced a $2bn (£1.3bn) arms sales deal with Pakistan to help boost the fight against Taliban groups using the country as a safe haven for attacks inside Afghanistan.In the summit Hillary Clinton announced 30% rise in arms funding to focus on offensives against terror havens along Afghanistan border.
PS: Your comments were quite amusing! ;)
yah..i have to agree at some points here coz u got some gud stats here,
ReplyDeletebut i'll justify giving military aid to pakistan, from USA's point of view, and not fully from india's point of view..
i'll say to it as - this aid is given for 2 reasons - firstly, if u want someone to stand along or besides u in a fight u would like him to be at par with u if not better, and secondly if u would like someone to concentrate to ur cause u would try to remove his other mind diverting worries (here which pakistan cries of - india's aggressive nature, forward osition and motion of troops by india). and india since it is supporting for the cause of eradication of terrorism cannot raise voice against it whole heartedly...
now coming to second discussion on taliban, i think u didnt follow me .... taliban has been in news and has been recognised by all as terrorist organization and what not, but dear, world doesnt work like that, do you know whos brainchild is taliban anyways... its USA (longback USSR era )... and now even he is not after them or otherwise he would not have been into negotiations with taliban... further Taliban had been funded by US for very long time via ISI. it got out its bounds and joined al kaida after USSR era when US had no more concern with them... later the two terrorist groups jointly acted as hands of ISI and worked for them against India in Kashmir, and the scene after 9/11 is know to everyone
and ur concern of forcing pak army against Taliban that is really not what it appears....
@Robota: Well i am very much aware of the inception of taliban during the US-USSR cold war,guess every intellect would be aware of that.I see no argument here,as i feel you have your own understanding and perspective! But your myth about US funding the taliban through ISI is totally untrue, rather you really need to clear your facts about it.Besides, the articles in my blog is my personal opinion.Obviously i am open for any debate but i really can't comment on issues regarding your understanding and lack of knowledge about facts! No offense, but i really think the above comments are out of the box.
ReplyDeletePS: its "Al-Qaieda" no kaida :P